ALDB vs VTI
Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ALDB or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ALDB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.71% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 12, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ALDB vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ALDB vs VTI Performance
Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (ALDB) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ALDB is up 2.71% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ALDB charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ALDB currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in ALDB and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 100.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in ALDB and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 5 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 5 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,150 positions ALDB does not, 97.5% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.40%, AAPL 6.29%, MSFT 4.79%, AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ALDB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ALDB or VTI?
ALDB has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ALDB or VTI?
ALDB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ALDB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.