AMDG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMDG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMDG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $30M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +197.37% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +310.32% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 209.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
AMDG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMDG returned +310.32% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, AMDG is up 197.37% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMDG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 209.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.0% for AMDG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMDG charges 0.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMDG currently yields 2.12% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AMDG and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMDG or VTI?
AMDG has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMDG or VTI?
Over the past year AMDG returned +310.32% vs +23.31% for VTI, so AMDG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AMDG annualized +230.72% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMDG or VTI?
AMDG has been the more volatile fund at 209.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMDG -63.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AMDG and VTI?
AMDG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMDG and VTI?
AMDG and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMDG or VTI?
AMDG yields 2.12% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AMDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.