ANEL vs IVV
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ANEL or IVV?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ANEL led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANEL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.31% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 18 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +58.27%Best | +12.27% |
| 1Y Return | +26.20%Best | +17.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 110.2% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,493Best | $11,820 |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 4, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1 years).
ANEL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ANEL vs IVV Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ANEL returned +26.20% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, ANEL is up 58.27% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ANEL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 110.2% compared with 13.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for ANEL and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANEL charges 1.31% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $131 vs $3 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANEL currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ANEL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANEL or IVV?
ANEL has an expense ratio of 1.31% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $128 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ANEL or IVV?
Over the past year ANEL returned +26.20% vs +17.04% for IVV, so ANEL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ANEL annualized +24.93% vs +18.20% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ANEL or IVV?
ANEL has been the more volatile fund at 110.2% annualized versus 13.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ANEL -56.6% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both ANEL and IVV?
ANEL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANEL or IVV?
ANEL yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ANEL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ANEL led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.