AOR vs IVV
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AOR or IVV?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.7B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.54% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 9 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.26% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.87% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.90% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.71% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0%Best | 14.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.0%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,836 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2008 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 11, 2008 to Sep 17, 2026 (17.8 years).
AOR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.8 years both funds cover.
AOR vs IVV Performance
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AOR returned +10.87% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, AOR is up 7.26% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, AOR compounded at +13.90% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.71% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.22% annualized vs +6.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 10.0% for AOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.0% for AOR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOR charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOR currently yields 2.54% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of AOR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings AOR also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in AOR and 490 in IVV, against full books of 9 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AOR (98.5% of the fund), and 7 for AOR that do not appear in IVV (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOR and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOR or IVV?
AOR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOR or IVV?
Over the past year AOR returned +10.87% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), AOR annualized +6.90% vs +13.22% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 10.0% for AOR. Worst drawdown: AOR -25.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both AOR and IVV?
AOR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOR or IVV?
AOR yields 2.54% while IVV yields 1.06%, so AOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AOR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.