APCB vs NUIB
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF vs Nuveen Impact Bond ETF
Which is better, APCB or NUIB?
APCB costs less.
APCB has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APCB | NUIB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36%Best | 0.37% |
| AUM | $989M | $45M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 3,770 | 58 |
| YTD Return | -1.72% | -0.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.93% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.28% | - |
| Fund Family | Envestnet Asset Management | Nuveen |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | May 3, 2023 | Sep 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
APCB vs NUIB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
APCB vs NUIB Performance
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) is an ETF from Envestnet Asset Management and Nuveen Impact Bond ETF (NUIB) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, APCB is down 1.72% versus a loss of 0.09% for NUIB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APCB charges 0.36% per year while NUIB charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $37 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APCB currently yields 4.44% against 0.00% for NUIB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1,221 holdings in APCB and 58 in NUIB, totalling 75.9% and 64.0% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1,221 positions we hold weights for in APCB and 58 in NUIB, against full books of 3,770 and 58.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in APCB | Weight in NUIB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFC 4.375 01/15/27 GInternational Finance Corp. 4.375 2027-01-15 | 0.01% | 1.04% | 1.03% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of APCB and NUIB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APCB or NUIB?
APCB has an expense ratio of 0.36% while NUIB charges 0.37%. APCB is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, APCB or NUIB?
APCB yields 4.44% while NUIB yields 0.00%, so APCB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUIB better than APCB?
APCB has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.