APMU vs IVV
ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. APMU offers more diversification with 716 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APMU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $246M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 716 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.22% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.22% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.97% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Envestnet Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | May 3, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
APMU vs IVV Performance
ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) is a ETF from Envestnet Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year APMU returned +2.22% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, APMU is up 0.22% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, APMU compounded at +2.97% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.5% for APMU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.4% for APMU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APMU charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APMU currently yields 2.72% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
APMU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1052 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APMU or IVV?
APMU has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, APMU or IVV?
Over the past year APMU returned +2.22% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), APMU annualized +1.95% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, APMU or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.5% for APMU. Worst drawdown: APMU -4.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both APMU and IVV?
APMU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between APMU and IVV?
APMU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1052 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, APMU or IVV?
APMU yields 2.72% while IVV yields 1.10%, so APMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.