APRW vs IVV
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APRW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $202M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.86% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.35% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.92% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.36% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 28, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
APRW vs IVV Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) is a ETF from AllianzIM and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year APRW returned +6.35% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, APRW is up 5.86% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, APRW compounded at +9.92% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.36% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.7% for APRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for APRW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APRW charges 0.74% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APRW currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APRW or IVV?
APRW has an expense ratio of 0.74% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, APRW or IVV?
Over the past year APRW returned +6.35% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), APRW annualized +6.56% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, APRW or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.7% for APRW. Worst drawdown: APRW -9.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both APRW and IVV?
APRW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, APRW or IVV?
APRW yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.