ARKG vs HUSV
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
Quick Verdict
HUSV has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | HUSV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $74M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.37% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | +51.88% | +8.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +76.15% | +4.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.66% | +9.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.51% | +5.94% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.4% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -35.7% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | Aug 24, 2016 |
ARKG vs HUSV Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year ARKG returned +76.15% while HUSV returned +4.82%. Year to date, ARKG is up 51.88% versus a gain of 8.25% for HUSV.
Over three years, ARKG compounded at +11.66% per year against +9.75% for HUSV; over five years the annualized figures are -11.51% and +5.94% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, HUSV has the edge at +8.47% annualized vs +7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.4% compared with 13.2% for HUSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -35.7% for HUSV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while HUSV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $70 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 1.37% for HUSV.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and HUSV share 0 holdings out of 132 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or HUSV?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while HUSV charges 0.70%. HUSV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or HUSV?
Over the past year ARKG returned +76.15% vs +4.82% for HUSV, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ARKG annualized +7.91% vs +8.47% for HUSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or HUSV?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 36.4% annualized versus 13.2% for HUSV. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs HUSV -35.7%.
Should I hold both ARKG and HUSV?
ARKG and HUSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and HUSV?
ARKG and HUSV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 132 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or HUSV?
ARKG yields 0.00% while HUSV yields 1.37%, so HUSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.