ARKG vs SAWS
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +52.67% | +15.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +90.55% | +22.18% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.88% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.71% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.4% | 18.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | Jul 30, 2024 |
ARKG vs SAWS Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year ARKG returned +90.55% while SAWS returned +22.18%. Year to date, ARKG is up 52.67% versus a gain of 15.23% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.4% compared with 18.4% for SAWS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $55 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 102 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or SAWS?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or SAWS?
Over the past year ARKG returned +90.55% vs +22.18% for SAWS, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ARKG annualized +7.96% vs +13.04% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or SAWS?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 36.4% annualized versus 18.4% for SAWS. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both ARKG and SAWS?
ARKG and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and SAWS?
ARKG and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 102 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or SAWS?
ARKG yields 0.00% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so SAWS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.