ARKY vs VTI
ARK Active Autocallable Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ARKY or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 3 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -3.50% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.50% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 74.6% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.5% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $7,132 | $15,599Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 29, 2024 to Sep 16, 2026 (2.6 years).
ARKY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
ARKY vs VTI Performance
ARK Active Autocallable Income ETF (ARKY) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARKY returned -3.50% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, ARKY is down 3.50% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 74.6% compared with 12.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.5% for ARKY and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKY charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKY currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKY or VTI?
ARKY has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKY or VTI?
Over the past year ARKY returned -3.50% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKY or VTI?
ARKY has been the more volatile fund at 74.6% annualized versus 12.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ARKY -58.5% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both ARKY and VTI?
ARKY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKY or VTI?
ARKY yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ARKY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.