ARP vs VTI
PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $66M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.15% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.67% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.83% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.46% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | PMV Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 21, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
ARP vs VTI Performance
PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) is a ETF from PMV Capital and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARP returned +23.83% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, ARP is up 11.67% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, ARP compounded at +13.46% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, ARP has the edge at +11.34% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 9.3% for ARP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for ARP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARP charges 1.42% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $142 vs $3 annually, a gap of $139 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARP currently yields 6.15% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ARP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARP or VTI?
ARP has an expense ratio of 1.42% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $139 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARP or VTI?
Over the past year ARP returned +23.83% vs +22.39% for VTI, so ARP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ARP annualized +11.34% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 9.3% for ARP. Worst drawdown: ARP -10.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ARP and VTI?
ARP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARP and VTI?
ARP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARP or VTI?
ARP yields 6.15% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ARP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.