ASET vs IVV
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASET | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.39% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.77% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.25% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.79% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.41% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 23, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
ASET vs IVV Performance
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASET returned +9.25% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, ASET is up 16.77% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, ASET compounded at +9.79% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.41% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.4% for ASET. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for ASET and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASET charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASET currently yields 3.39% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASET or IVV?
ASET has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASET or IVV?
Over the past year ASET returned +9.25% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ASET annualized +6.15% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASET or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.4% for ASET. Worst drawdown: ASET -42.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASET and IVV?
ASET and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASET or IVV?
ASET yields 3.39% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ASET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.