ASMG vs IVV
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASMG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $34M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.89% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +102.47% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +335.13% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 98.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 14, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ASMG vs IVV Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASMG returned +335.13% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, ASMG is up 102.47% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 98.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.0% for ASMG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASMG charges 0.77% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $3 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASMG currently yields 3.89% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ASMG and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASMG or IVV?
ASMG has an expense ratio of 0.77% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASMG or IVV?
Over the past year ASMG returned +335.13% vs +22.02% for IVV, so ASMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ASMG annualized +136.66% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASMG or IVV?
ASMG has been the more volatile fund at 98.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASMG -44.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASMG and IVV?
ASMG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASMG and IVV?
ASMG and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASMG or IVV?
ASMG yields 3.89% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ASMG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.