ASMH vs IVV
ASML Holding NV ADRhedged vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASMH delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASMH | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +58.22% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +154.53% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 46.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ADRH | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 13, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ASMH vs IVV Performance
ASML Holding NV ADRhedged (ASMH) is a ETF from ADRH and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASMH returned +154.53% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, ASMH is up 58.22% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASMH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 46.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.5% for ASMH and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASMH charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASMH currently yields 1.56% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ASMH and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASMH or IVV?
ASMH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASMH or IVV?
Over the past year ASMH returned +154.53% vs +22.61% for IVV, so ASMH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ASMH annualized +87.87% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASMH or IVV?
ASMH has been the more volatile fund at 46.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASMH -21.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASMH and IVV?
ASMH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASMH and IVV?
ASMH and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASMH or IVV?
ASMH yields 1.56% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ASMH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.