ASMU vs IVV
Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ASMU or IVV?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASMU | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 10 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +22.95%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 11, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ASMU vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ASMU vs IVV Performance
Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ASMU is up 22.95% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASMU charges 0.97% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASMU currently yields 0.67% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in ASMU and 504 in IVV, totalling 94.6% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in ASMU and 504 in IVV, against full books of 10 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASMU and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASMU or IVV?
ASMU has an expense ratio of 0.97% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASMU or IVV?
ASMU yields 0.67% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ASMU?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.