AUGZ vs IVV
TrueShares Structured Outcome August ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUGZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $44M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.39% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 19 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.48% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.78% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.75% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.96% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
AUGZ vs IVV Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome August ETF (AUGZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AUGZ returned +14.78% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, AUGZ is up 8.48% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, AUGZ compounded at +15.75% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.96% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, AUGZ has the edge at +12.63% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.1% for AUGZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for AUGZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUGZ charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUGZ currently yields 3.39% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AUGZ and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUGZ or IVV?
AUGZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AUGZ or IVV?
Over the past year AUGZ returned +14.78% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), AUGZ annualized +12.63% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AUGZ or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.1% for AUGZ. Worst drawdown: AUGZ -15.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AUGZ and IVV?
AUGZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between AUGZ and IVV?
AUGZ and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUGZ or IVV?
AUGZ yields 3.39% while IVV yields 1.10%, so AUGZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.