AVGG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVGG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $52M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -9.42% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.14% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +55.24% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +55.24% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 198333.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 16, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
AVGG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AVGG returned +15.14% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AVGG is down 9.42% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, AVGG compounded at +55.24% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +55.24% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, AVGG has the edge at +25.94% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 198333.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for AVGG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVGG charges 0.76% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVGG currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AVGG and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVGG or VTI?
AVGG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVGG or VTI?
Over the past year AVGG returned +15.14% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), AVGG annualized +25.94% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVGG or VTI?
AVGG has been the more volatile fund at 198333.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AVGG -99.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AVGG and VTI?
AVGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVGG and VTI?
AVGG and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVGG or VTI?
AVGG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.