AVGU vs IVV
GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AVGU or IVV?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVGU | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $31M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -15.79% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | -22.14% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 93.3% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,214 | $12,473Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 15, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 15, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.2 years).
AVGU vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
AVGU vs IVV Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) is an ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AVGU returned -22.14% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, AVGU is down 15.79% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVGU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 93.3% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.2% for AVGU and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVGU charges 1.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVGU currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AVGU and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVGU or IVV?
AVGU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVGU or IVV?
Over the past year AVGU returned -22.14% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AVGU annualized +10.02% vs +20.22% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVGU or IVV?
AVGU has been the more volatile fund at 93.3% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AVGU -56.2% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both AVGU and IVV?
AVGU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVGU or IVV?
AVGU yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AVGU?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.