AVMA vs IVV
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AVMA or IVV?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 92.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVMA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $88M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 18 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.76% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.01% | +15.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.02% | +20.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.61% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $15,303 | $17,864Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 92.2% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2023 to Sep 16, 2026 (3.2 years).
AVMA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
AVMA vs IVV Performance
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AVMA returned +14.01% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, AVMA is up 9.76% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Over three years, AVMA compounded at +15.02% per year against +20.81% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 9.4% for AVMA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for AVMA and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVMA charges 0.21% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $3 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVMA currently yields 1.99% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 18 holdings in AVMA and 490 in IVV, totalling 100.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 18 positions we hold weights for in AVMA and 490 in IVV, against full books of 18 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AVMA (98.6% of the fund), and 17 for AVMA that do not appear in IVV (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AVMA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVMA or IVV?
AVMA has an expense ratio of 0.21% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVMA or IVV?
Over the past year AVMA returned +14.01% vs +15.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVMA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 9.4% for AVMA. Worst drawdown: AVMA -11.8% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both AVMA and IVV?
AVMA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVMA or IVV?
AVMA yields 1.99% while IVV yields 1.06%, so AVMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AVMA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 92.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.