AVNM vs ETW
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF vs Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
Quick Verdict
AVNM has a lower expense ratio. AVNM delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 291 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVNM | ETW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 1.10% | |
| AUM | $734M | $936M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.36% | 7.47% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 291 | |
| YTD Return | +16.98% | +13.04% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.84% | +20.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.03% | +17.59% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 16.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.0% | -72.8% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Eaton Vance | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2023 | Sep 30, 2005 |
AVNM vs ETW Performance
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is a ETF from Eaton Vance. Over the past year AVNM returned +28.84% while ETW returned +20.73%. Year to date, AVNM is up 16.98% versus a gain of 13.04% for ETW.
Over three years, AVNM compounded at +23.03% per year against +17.59% for ETW. Across the full 3-year window we track, AVNM has the edge at +22.05% annualized vs -1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 12.7% for AVNM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.0% for AVNM and -72.8% for ETW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVNM charges 0.31% per year while ETW charges 1.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $110 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVNM currently yields 2.36% against 7.47% for ETW.
Holdings Overlap
AVNM and ETW share 0 holdings out of 267 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVNM or ETW?
AVNM has an expense ratio of 0.31% while ETW charges 1.10%. AVNM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $79 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVNM or ETW?
Over the past year AVNM returned +28.84% vs +20.73% for ETW, so AVNM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), AVNM annualized +22.05% vs -1.04% for ETW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVNM or ETW?
ETW has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 12.7% for AVNM. Worst drawdown: AVNM -14.0% vs ETW -72.8%.
Should I hold both AVNM and ETW?
AVNM and ETW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVNM and ETW?
AVNM and ETW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 267 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVNM or ETW?
AVNM yields 2.36% while ETW yields 7.47%, so ETW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.