AVNM vs FMN
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF vs Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund
Quick Verdict
AVNM has a lower expense ratio. AVNM delivered stronger 1-year returns. FMN offers more diversification with 150 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVNM | FMN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $734M | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.36% | 4.43% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 150 | |
| YTD Return | +16.94% | +2.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.23% | +9.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.96% | +7.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -2.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.0% | -53.4% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Federated Hermes | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2023 | Dec 20, 2002 |
AVNM vs FMN Performance
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN) is a ETF from Federated Hermes. Over the past year AVNM returned +29.23% while FMN returned +9.07%. Year to date, AVNM is up 16.94% versus a gain of 2.40% for FMN.
Over three years, AVNM compounded at +22.96% per year against +7.44% for FMN. Across the full 3-year window we track, AVNM has the edge at +22.00% annualized vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 12.7% for AVNM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.0% for AVNM and -53.4% for FMN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVNM charges 0.31% per year while FMN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $75 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVNM currently yields 2.36% against 4.43% for FMN.
Holdings Overlap
AVNM and FMN share 0 holdings out of 93 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVNM or FMN?
AVNM has an expense ratio of 0.31% while FMN charges 0.75%. AVNM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVNM or FMN?
Over the past year AVNM returned +29.23% vs +9.07% for FMN, so AVNM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), AVNM annualized +22.00% vs -0.25% for FMN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVNM or FMN?
FMN has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 12.7% for AVNM. Worst drawdown: AVNM -14.0% vs FMN -53.4%.
Should I hold both AVNM and FMN?
AVNM and FMN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVNM and FMN?
AVNM and FMN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 93 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVNM or FMN?
AVNM yields 2.36% while FMN yields 4.43%, so FMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.