AVNM vs SAWS
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
AVNM has a lower expense ratio. AVNM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 72 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVNM | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $734M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.36% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +16.19% | +16.61% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.08% | +21.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.86% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.0% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2023 | Jul 30, 2024 |
AVNM vs SAWS Performance
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year AVNM returned +29.08% while SAWS returned +21.00%. Year to date, AVNM is up 16.19% versus a gain of 16.61% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 12.6% for AVNM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.0% for AVNM and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVNM charges 0.31% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $55 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVNM currently yields 2.36% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
AVNM and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 81 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVNM or SAWS?
AVNM has an expense ratio of 0.31% while SAWS charges 0.55%. AVNM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVNM or SAWS?
Over the past year AVNM returned +29.08% vs +21.00% for SAWS, so AVNM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AVNM annualized +22.02% vs +13.64% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVNM or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 12.6% for AVNM. Worst drawdown: AVNM -14.0% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both AVNM and SAWS?
AVNM and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVNM and SAWS?
AVNM and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 81 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVNM or SAWS?
AVNM yields 2.36% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so AVNM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.