AVS vs VTI
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.58% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -17.15% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | -32.19% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 46.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
AVS vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X ETF (AVS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AVS returned -32.19% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, AVS is down 17.15% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 46.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.6% for AVS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVS charges 1.03% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $3 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVS currently yields 3.58% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AVS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVS or VTI?
AVS has an expense ratio of 1.03% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $100 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVS or VTI?
Over the past year AVS returned -32.19% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AVS annualized -45.23% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVS or VTI?
AVS has been the more volatile fund at 46.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AVS -76.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AVS and VTI?
AVS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVS and VTI?
AVS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVS or VTI?
AVS yields 3.58% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AVS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.