AVSE vs TYLG
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
AVSE has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. AVSE offers more diversification with 2,438 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVSE | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $221M | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 2,438 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +19.26% | +21.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.08% | +35.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.17% | +23.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2022 | Nov 21, 2022 |
AVSE vs TYLG Performance
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year AVSE returned +34.08% while TYLG returned +35.64%. Year to date, AVSE is up 19.26% versus a gain of 21.18% for TYLG.
Over three years, AVSE compounded at +24.17% per year against +23.66% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.12% annualized vs +13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.8% for TYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for AVSE and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVSE charges 0.33% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $60 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVSE currently yields 2.16% against 8.89% for TYLG.
Holdings Overlap
AVSE and TYLG share 0 holdings out of 1601 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVSE or TYLG?
AVSE has an expense ratio of 0.33% while TYLG charges 0.60%. AVSE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVSE or TYLG?
Over the past year AVSE returned +34.08% vs +35.64% for TYLG, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AVSE annualized +13.60% vs +25.12% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVSE or TYLG?
AVSE has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.8% for TYLG. Worst drawdown: AVSE -26.3% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both AVSE and TYLG?
AVSE and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVSE and TYLG?
AVSE and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1601 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVSE or TYLG?
AVSE yields 2.16% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.