AWF vs HCOM
AWF vs HCOM
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
HCOM has a lower expense ratio. AWF delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | HCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $969M | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 10.95% | |
| Holdings | 1,273 | 55 | |
| YTD Return | -1.51% | +0.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.78% | -4.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.35% | -6.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.44% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.0% | -28.8% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Commodity | |
| Inception | Jul 28, 1993 | Sep 14, 2021 |
AWF vs HCOM Performance
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (AWF) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year AWF returned -2.78% while HCOM returned -4.90%. Year to date, AWF is down 1.51% versus a gain of 0.71% for HCOM.
Over three years, AWF compounded at +8.35% per year against -6.95% for HCOM. Across the full 4-year window we track, AWF has the edge at +0.90% annualized vs +0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AWF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 14.7% for HCOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.0% for AWF and -28.8% for HCOM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWF charges 1.00% per year while HCOM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $59 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWF currently yields 6.92% against 10.95% for HCOM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWF or HCOM?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while HCOM charges 0.59%. HCOM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AWF or HCOM?
Over the past year AWF returned -2.78% vs -4.90% for HCOM, so AWF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AWF annualized +0.90% vs +0.68% for HCOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AWF or HCOM?
AWF has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 14.7% for HCOM. Worst drawdown: AWF -60.0% vs HCOM -28.8%.
Should I hold both AWF and HCOM?
AWF and HCOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWF or HCOM?
AWF yields 6.92% while HCOM yields 10.95%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.