AWF vs VOO
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AWF or VOO?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $974M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.98% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 1,273 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -1.46% | +13.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.28% | +21.53%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.30% | +21.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.64% | +12.87%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,957 | $18,319Best |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 28, 1993 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 3, 2026 (16 years).
AWF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AWF vs VOO Performance
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (AWF) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AWF returned -4.28% while VOO returned +21.53%. Year to date, AWF is down 1.46% versus a gain of 13.81% for VOO.
Over three years, AWF compounded at +8.30% per year against +21.46% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.64% and +12.87% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +0.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.8% for AWF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for AWF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AWF charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWF currently yields 6.98% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 707 holdings in AWF and 505 in VOO, totalling 65.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 365 days apart, AWF as of Jun 30, 2025 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 707 positions we hold weights for in AWF and 505 in VOO, against full books of 1,273 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AWF and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AWF or VOO?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AWF or VOO?
Over the past year AWF returned -4.28% vs +21.53% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), AWF annualized +0.34% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AWF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.8% for AWF. Worst drawdown: AWF -56.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AWF and VOO?
AWF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AWF or VOO?
AWF yields 6.98% while VOO yields 1.08%, so AWF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than AWF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.