BAMA vs SPY
Brookstone Active ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMA | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $50M | $814.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +7.49% | +12.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.62% | +20.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.07% | +20.82% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.53% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BAMA vs SPY Performance
Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BAMA returned +13.62% while SPY returned +20.30%. Year to date, BAMA is up 7.49% versus a gain of 12.10% for SPY.
Over three years, BAMA compounded at +15.07% per year against +20.82% for SPY. Across the full 3-year window we track, BAMA has the edge at +15.07% annualized vs +8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.9% for BAMA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for BAMA and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMA charges 0.99% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $9 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMA currently yields 1.33% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
BAMA and SPY share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMA or SPY?
BAMA has an expense ratio of 0.99% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMA or SPY?
Over the past year BAMA returned +13.62% vs +20.30% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMA annualized +15.07% vs +8.78% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMA or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.9% for BAMA. Worst drawdown: BAMA -12.3% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BAMA and SPY?
BAMA and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMA and SPY?
BAMA and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMA or SPY?
BAMA yields 1.33% while SPY yields 1.01%, so BAMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.