BBBI vs VYM

BBBI vs VYM

Which is better, BBBI or VYM?

VYM has been ahead.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBBIVYM
Expense Ratio0.19%0.04%Best
AUM$170M$81.6B
Dividend Yield4.90%2.22%
Holdings1,004613
YTD Return-1.55%+11.35%Best
1Y Return-0.68%+15.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.22%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.30%
Volatility (annualized)4.6%Best10.5%
Max Drawdown-4.1%Best-14.5%
$10,000 over 2.6 years$11,204$14,941Best
Fund FamilyBondBloxxVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Value
InceptionJan 16, 2024Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 25, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.6 years).

BBBI vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.

BBBI vs VYM Performance

BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) is an ETF from BondBloxx and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBBI returned -0.68% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, BBBI is down 1.55% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.5% compared with 4.6% for BBBI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.1% for BBBI and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BBBI charges 0.19% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $4 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBBI currently yields 4.90% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 679 holdings in BBBI and 557 in VYM, totalling 67.3% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 679 positions we hold weights for in BBBI and 557 in VYM, against full books of 1,004 and 613.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BBBI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BBBIVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BBBI or VYM?

BBBI has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BBBI or VYM?

Over the past year BBBI returned -0.68% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BBBI or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.5% annualized versus 4.6% for BBBI. Worst drawdown: BBBI -4.1% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both BBBI and VYM?

BBBI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BBBI or VYM?

BBBI yields 4.90% while VYM yields 2.22%, so BBBI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than BBBI?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.