BBHY vs QQQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
BBHY has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBHY offers more diversification with 1201 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBHY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $620M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.41% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 1,563 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.37% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.06% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.65% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.62% | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BBHY vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BBHY returned +3.06% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, BBHY is up 0.37% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, BBHY compounded at +7.65% per year against +26.25% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.62% and +15.39% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.7% for BBHY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.3% for BBHY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBHY charges 0.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $18 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBHY currently yields 7.41% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BBHY and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 1304 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBHY or QQQ?
BBHY has an expense ratio of 0.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BBHY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBHY or QQQ?
Over the past year BBHY returned +3.06% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BBHY annualized +2.38% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBHY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.7% for BBHY. Worst drawdown: BBHY -25.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BBHY and QQQ?
BBHY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBHY and QQQ?
BBHY and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1304 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBHY or QQQ?
BBHY yields 7.41% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BBHY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.