BDBT vs IVV
Bluemonte Core Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BDBT or IVV?
Intermediate Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BDBT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $485M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.97% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -1.24% | +14.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.36% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.17% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.2%Best | 11.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.4%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $10,222 | $12,949Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Bluemonte Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Intermediate Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 23, 2025 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.2 years).
BDBT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
BDBT vs IVV Performance
Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) is an ETF from Bluemonte Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BDBT returned -0.36% while IVV returned +17.31%. Year to date, BDBT is down 1.24% versus a gain of 14.15% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 3.2% for BDBT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.4% for BDBT and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BDBT charges 0.23% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BDBT currently yields 3.97% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in BDBT and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.8% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in BDBT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 7 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BDBT (98.6% of the fund), and 6 for BDBT that do not appear in IVV (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BDBT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BDBT or IVV?
BDBT has an expense ratio of 0.23% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BDBT or IVV?
Over the past year BDBT returned -0.36% vs +17.31% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BDBT annualized +1.85% vs +24.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BDBT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 3.2% for BDBT. Worst drawdown: BDBT -3.4% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both BDBT and IVV?
BDBT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BDBT or IVV?
BDBT yields 3.97% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BDBT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BDBT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.