BEGS vs QQQ
Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BEGS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 82.08% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -38.51% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | -38.34% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Rareview Capital | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 4, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BEGS vs QQQ Performance
Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) is a ETF from Rareview Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BEGS returned -38.34% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, BEGS is down 38.51% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BEGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.9% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.2% for BEGS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BEGS charges 0.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $18 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEGS currently yields 82.08% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BEGS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BEGS or QQQ?
BEGS has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BEGS or QQQ?
Over the past year BEGS returned -38.34% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BEGS annualized -7.40% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BEGS or QQQ?
BEGS has been the more volatile fund at 44.9% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BEGS -60.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BEGS and QQQ?
BEGS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BEGS and QQQ?
BEGS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BEGS or QQQ?
BEGS yields 82.08% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BEGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.