BEMB vs IVV
iShares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BEMB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.07% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 259 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.49% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.06% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.39% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BEMB vs IVV Performance
iShares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BEMB returned +4.06% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, BEMB is down 0.49% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, BEMB compounded at +7.39% per year against +21.49% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, BEMB has the edge at +7.43% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.0% for BEMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.2% for BEMB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BEMB charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEMB currently yields 6.07% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BEMB and IVV share 1 holdings out of 613 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BEMB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 1.60% | 0.15% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BEMB or IVV?
BEMB has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BEMB or IVV?
Over the past year BEMB returned +4.06% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BEMB annualized +7.43% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BEMB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.0% for BEMB. Worst drawdown: BEMB -6.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BEMB and IVV?
BEMB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BEMB and IVV?
BEMB and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 613 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BEMB or IVV?
BEMB yields 6.07% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BEMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.