BETH vs QQQ
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BETH or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BETH | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 33.37% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 2 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -18.31% | +17.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | -38.78% | +22.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.35% | +25.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.8% | 17.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.1% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $19,228 | $20,358Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3 years).
BETH vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BETH vs QQQ Performance
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF (BETH) is an ETF from ProShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BETH returned -38.78% while QQQ returned +22.10%. Year to date, BETH is down 18.31% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Over three years, BETH compounded at +24.35% per year against +25.27% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BETH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.8% compared with 17.4% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.1% for BETH and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BETH charges 0.95% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $18 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BETH currently yields 33.37% against 0.44% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BETH and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BETH or QQQ?
BETH has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BETH or QQQ?
Over the past year BETH returned -38.78% vs +22.10% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BETH or QQQ?
BETH has been the more volatile fund at 53.8% annualized versus 17.4% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BETH -57.1% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both BETH and QQQ?
BETH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BETH or QQQ?
BETH yields 33.37% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BETH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BETH?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.