BFEB vs LAPR
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February vs Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
Which is better, BFEB or LAPR?
BFEB has been ahead.
BFEB led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFEB | LAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $208M | $11M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 5.48% |
| Holdings | 18 | 30 |
| YTD Return | +11.67%Best | +0.12% |
| 1Y Return | +15.60%Best | +0.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.68% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4% | 1.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8% | -3.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $13,797Best | $10,809 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2020 | Apr 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
BFEB vs LAPR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
BFEB vs LAPR Performance
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% while LAPR returned +0.04%. Year to date, BFEB is up 11.67% versus a gain of 0.12% for LAPR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BFEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.4% compared with 1.6% for LAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -3.8% for LAPR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFEB charges 0.79% per year while LAPR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 5.48% for LAPR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BFEB and LAPR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFEB or LAPR?
BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while LAPR charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, BFEB or LAPR?
Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% vs +0.04% for LAPR, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BFEB or LAPR?
BFEB has been the more volatile fund at 7.4% annualized versus 1.6% for LAPR. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs LAPR -3.8%.
Should I hold both BFEB and LAPR?
BFEB and LAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or LAPR?
BFEB yields 0.00% while LAPR yields 5.48%, so LAPR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LAPR better than BFEB?
BFEB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.