BFEB vs MSFY
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February vs Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
Which is better, BFEB or MSFY?
BFEB has been ahead.
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFEB | MSFY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 0.99% |
| AUM | $262M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 21.85% |
| Holdings | 12 | 11 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | -6.22% |
| 1Y Return | +16.31%Best | -11.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.35%Best | -4.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1%Best | 29.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8%Best | -44.7% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $16,864Best | $8,839 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Kurv |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2020 | Oct 27, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2023 to Oct 13, 2026 (3 years).
BFEB vs MSFY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BFEB vs MSFY Performance
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) is an ETF from Kurv. Over the past year BFEB returned +16.31% while MSFY returned -11.45%. Year to date, BFEB is up 12.51% versus a loss of 6.22% for MSFY.
Over three years, BFEB compounded at +17.35% per year against -4.03% for MSFY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.9% compared with 8.1% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -44.7% for MSFY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFEB charges 0.79% per year while MSFY charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $99 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 21.85% for MSFY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BFEB and MSFY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFEB or MSFY?
BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while MSFY charges 0.99%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BFEB or MSFY?
Over the past year BFEB returned +16.31% vs -11.45% for MSFY, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BFEB or MSFY?
MSFY has been the more volatile fund at 29.9% annualized versus 8.1% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs MSFY -44.7%.
Should I hold both BFEB and MSFY?
BFEB and MSFY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or MSFY?
BFEB yields 0.00% while MSFY yields 21.85%, so MSFY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSFY better than BFEB?
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.