BFEB vs TSLP

BFEB vs TSLP

Which is better, BFEB or TSLP?

BFEB has been ahead.

BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: BFEBHigher Returns: BFEB

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBFEBTSLP
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.00%
AUM$262M$17M
Dividend Yield0.00%33.35%
Holdings1221
YTD Return+12.41%Best-35.09%
1Y Return+16.21%Best-33.93%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.66%Best-15.54%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.04%-
Volatility (annualized)8.1%Best49.1%
Max Drawdown-13.8%Best-67.7%
$10,000 over 3 years$17,082Best$6,025
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustKurv
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionFeb 3, 2020Oct 27, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2023 to Oct 12, 2026 (3 years).

BFEB vs TSLP growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.

Compare BFEB against instead:BFEB vs SPYBFEB vs QQQBFEB vs VOOBFEB vs VTITSLP against:TSLP vs VXUS

BFEB vs TSLP Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) is an ETF from Kurv. Over the past year BFEB returned +16.21% while TSLP returned -33.93%. Year to date, BFEB is up 12.41% versus a loss of 35.09% for TSLP.

Over three years, BFEB compounded at +17.66% per year against -15.54% for TSLP.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TSLP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.1% compared with 8.1% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -67.7% for TSLP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BFEB charges 0.79% per year while TSLP charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $100 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 33.35% for TSLP.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BFEB and TSLP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BFEBTSLP

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BFEB or TSLP?

BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while TSLP charges 1.00%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BFEB or TSLP?

Over the past year BFEB returned +16.21% vs -33.93% for TSLP, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BFEB or TSLP?

TSLP has been the more volatile fund at 49.1% annualized versus 8.1% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs TSLP -67.7%.

Should I hold both BFEB and TSLP?

BFEB and TSLP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or TSLP?

BFEB yields 0.00% while TSLP yields 33.35%, so TSLP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TSLP better than BFEB?

BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.