BFOC vs VTI
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFOC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -7.80% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
BFOC vs VTI Performance
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BFOC is down 7.80% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for BFOC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFOC charges 0.90% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFOC currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFOC or VTI?
BFOC has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFOC or VTI?
BFOC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.