BILZ vs IVV
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BILZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $989M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.13% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.84% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.48% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.49% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BILZ vs IVV Performance
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) is a ETF from PIMCO (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BILZ returned +3.48% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, BILZ is up 1.84% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, BILZ compounded at +4.49% per year against +21.55% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 0.4% for BILZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.5% for BILZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BILZ charges 0.14% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BILZ currently yields 4.13% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BILZ or IVV?
BILZ has an expense ratio of 0.14% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BILZ or IVV?
Over the past year BILZ returned +3.48% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BILZ annualized +4.36% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BILZ or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 0.4% for BILZ. Worst drawdown: BILZ -0.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BILZ and IVV?
BILZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BILZ or IVV?
BILZ yields 4.13% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BILZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.