BITI vs VTI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BITI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $120M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.63% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.73% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +55.71% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -33.37% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 46.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
BITI vs VTI Performance
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BITI returned +55.71% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, BITI is up 21.73% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, BITI compounded at -33.37% per year against +21.43% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -37.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BITI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 46.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.2% for BITI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITI charges 1.01% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITI currently yields 8.63% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BITI and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITI or VTI?
BITI has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BITI or VTI?
Over the past year BITI returned +55.71% vs +23.62% for VTI, so BITI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BITI annualized -37.09% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BITI or VTI?
BITI has been the more volatile fund at 46.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BITI -92.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BITI and VTI?
BITI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BITI and VTI?
BITI and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITI or VTI?
BITI yields 8.63% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BITI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.