BIV vs VGHAX

BIV vs VGHAX

Which is better, BIV or VGHAX?

BIV costs less.

BIV has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: BIV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBIVVGHAX
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.27%
AUM$28.8B$32.8B
Dividend Yield4.32%6.15%
Holdings2,336109
YTD Price Return-4.74%+1.44%
1Y Price Return-5.47%+13.44%
3Y Price Return (annualized)+0.34%-0.44%
5Y Price Return (annualized)-3.90%-2.56%
Volatility (annualized)6.8%Best15.3%
Max Drawdown-22.3%Best-32.7%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Growth
InceptionApr 3, 2007Nov 12, 2001

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over 5 years, Top 10 Weight.

A price return is not the return of a fund that pays its income out. The coupon or distribution never appears in the price, so the return rows carry no winner here. BIV currently yields 4.32% and VGHAX 6.15%.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2021 to Sep 9, 2026 (5 years).

Compare BIV against instead:BIV vs SPYBIV vs QQQBIV vs VOOBIV vs VTIVGHAX against:VGHAX vs VXUS

BIV vs VGHAX Performance

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Health Care Fund Admiral Shares (VGHAX) is a mutual fund from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIV's price moved -5.47% and VGHAX's +13.44%, before the income each one paid out.

Over three years, BIV compounded at +0.34% per year against -0.44% for VGHAX; over five years the annualized figures are -3.90% and -2.56% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VGHAX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.8% for BIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for BIV and -32.7% for VGHAX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BIV charges 0.03% per year while VGHAX charges 0.27%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $27 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIV currently yields 4.32% against 6.15% for VGHAX.

Structure and taxes

VGHAX is a mutual fund and BIV is an ETF. A mutual fund prices once a day at net asset value and may carry a purchase minimum. An ETF trades through the day at whatever the market pays for it.

In a taxable account the difference that usually matters is distributions. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely has to sell holdings and rarely passes a capital gain to the people who held it; a mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can distribute a realised gain at year end to everyone still in the fund, whether or not they sold anything themselves. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. Both are descriptions of how the two wrappers work, not a recommendation.

Tax-loss harvesting works on either wrapper.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 282 holdings in BIV and 86 in VGHAX, totalling 19.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 91 days apart, BIV as of Jun 30, 2026 and VGHAX as of Mar 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 282 positions we hold weights for in BIV and 86 in VGHAX, against full books of 2,336 and 109.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BIV and VGHAX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BIVVGHAX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BIV or VGHAX?

BIV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VGHAX charges 0.27%. BIV is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, BIV or VGHAX?

VGHAX has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.8% for BIV. Worst drawdown: BIV -22.3% vs VGHAX -32.7%.

Should I hold both BIV and VGHAX?

BIV and VGHAX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BIV or VGHAX?

BIV yields 4.32% while VGHAX yields 6.15%, so VGHAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is it better to hold VGHAX or BIV in a taxable account?

BIV is an ETF and VGHAX is a mutual fund. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely distributes a capital gain to the people holding it. A mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can pass a realised gain to every holder at year end. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. This is information, not a recommendation.

Is VGHAX better than BIV?

BIV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.