BIV vs VGIT

BIV vs VGIT

Which is better, BIV or VGIT?

Each has led over a different period.

BIV led over 3Y, VGIT over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBIVVGIT
Expense Ratio0.03%Tie0.03%Tie
AUM$28.8B$50.8B
Dividend Yield4.32%3.90%
Holdings2,336106
YTD Return-1.85%-1.68%Best
1Y Return-1.22%-0.98%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+4.34%Best+3.67%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.41%-0.30%Best
Volatility (annualized)5.3%4.3%Best
Max Drawdown-20.3%-17.2%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,797$9,851Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionApr 3, 2007Nov 19, 2009

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 23, 2009 to Sep 17, 2026 (16.8 years).

BIV vs VGIT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.8 years both funds cover.

Compare BIV against instead:BIV vs SPYBIV vs QQQBIV vs VOOBIV vs VTIVGIT against:VGIT vs VXUS

BIV vs VGIT Performance

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIV returned -1.22% while VGIT returned -0.98%. Year to date, BIV is down 1.85% versus a loss of 1.68% for VGIT.

Over three years, BIV compounded at +4.34% per year against +3.67% for VGIT; over five years the annualized figures are -0.41% and -0.30% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VGIT has the edge at +0.68% annualized vs +0.62%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 4.3% for VGIT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.3% for BIV and -17.2% for VGIT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BIV charges 0.03% per year while VGIT charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, BIV currently yields 4.32% against 3.90% for VGIT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BIV and VGIT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BIVVGIT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BIV or VGIT?

BIV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VGIT charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, BIV or VGIT?

Over the past year BIV returned -1.22% vs -0.98% for VGIT, so VGIT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), BIV annualized +0.62% vs +0.68% for VGIT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BIV or VGIT?

BIV has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 4.3% for VGIT. Worst drawdown: BIV -20.3% vs VGIT -17.2%.

Should I hold both BIV and VGIT?

BIV and VGIT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BIV or VGIT?

BIV yields 4.32% while VGIT yields 3.90%, so BIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VGIT better than BIV?

BIV led over 3Y, VGIT over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.