BLGR vs QQQ
Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 107 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLGR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.24% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $288M | $486.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 107 | |
| YTD Return | +11.21% | +17.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.81% | +27.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Bluemonte Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BLGR vs QQQ Performance
Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) is a ETF from Bluemonte Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BLGR returned +19.81% while QQQ returned +27.33%. Year to date, BLGR is up 11.21% versus a gain of 17.18% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.8% for BLGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.1% for BLGR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLGR charges 0.24% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $24 vs $18 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLGR currently yields 0.34% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BLGR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLGR or QQQ?
BLGR has an expense ratio of 0.24% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLGR or QQQ?
Over the past year BLGR returned +19.81% vs +27.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BLGR annualized +23.75% vs +13.04% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLGR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.8% for BLGR. Worst drawdown: BLGR -14.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BLGR and QQQ?
BLGR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BLGR and QQQ?
BLGR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLGR or QQQ?
BLGR yields 0.34% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.