BLUC vs QQQ
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLUC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | - | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.05% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.49% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Bluemonte Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BLUC vs QQQ Performance
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) is a ETF from Bluemonte Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BLUC returned +20.49% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, BLUC is up 12.05% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.7% for BLUC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.7% for BLUC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLUC charges 0.23% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $18 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
BLUC and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 107 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLUC or QQQ?
BLUC has an expense ratio of 0.23% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLUC or QQQ?
Over the past year BLUC returned +20.49% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BLUC annualized +24.12% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLUC or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.7% for BLUC. Worst drawdown: BLUC -10.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BLUC and QQQ?
BLUC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BLUC and QQQ?
BLUC and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 107 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.