BMAR vs VYM
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - March vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMAR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $251M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +10.91% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.19% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.39% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.07% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 28, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BMAR vs VYM Performance
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BMAR returned +18.19% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, BMAR is up 10.91% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, BMAR compounded at +16.39% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.07% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BMAR has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 10.0% for BMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.4% for BMAR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMAR charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMAR currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMAR or VYM?
BMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BMAR or VYM?
Over the past year BMAR returned +18.19% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BMAR annualized +13.06% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BMAR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 10.0% for BMAR. Worst drawdown: BMAR -21.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BMAR and VYM?
BMAR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMAR or VYM?
BMAR yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.