BMAY vs IVV
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - May vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMAY | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $232M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.06% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.90% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.89% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.78% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
BMAY vs IVV Performance
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BMAY returned +12.90% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, BMAY is up 8.06% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, BMAY compounded at +14.89% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.78% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BMAY has the edge at +10.98% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.5% for BMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for BMAY and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMAY charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMAY currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMAY or IVV?
BMAY has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BMAY or IVV?
Over the past year BMAY returned +12.90% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BMAY annualized +10.98% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BMAY or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.5% for BMAY. Worst drawdown: BMAY -17.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BMAY and IVV?
BMAY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMAY or IVV?
BMAY yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.