BOTT vs IVV
Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BOTT or IVV?
BOTT has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BOTT led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOTT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $62M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 42 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -3.37% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +26.22%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.0% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $17,657Best | $15,958 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 22, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 22, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2.4 years).
BOTT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
BOTT vs IVV Performance
Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) is an ETF from Themes ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BOTT returned +26.22% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, BOTT is down 3.37% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOTT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.0% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for BOTT and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOTT charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOTT currently yields 0.14% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
13.7% of BOTT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.4% of IVV's money is in holdings BOTT also owns.
BOTT and IVV share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in BOTT and 504 in IVV, against full books of 42 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 490 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BOTT (89.8% of the fund), and 4 for BOTT that do not appear in IVV (11.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BOTT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOTT or IVV?
BOTT has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BOTT or IVV?
Over the past year BOTT returned +26.22% vs +20.08% for IVV, so BOTT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BOTT annualized +26.73% vs +21.50% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BOTT or IVV?
BOTT has been the more volatile fund at 35.0% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BOTT -38.5% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BOTT and IVV?
BOTT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BOTT and IVV?
13.7% of BOTT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.4% of IVV's is in holdings BOTT also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in BOTT and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOTT or IVV?
BOTT yields 0.14% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BOTT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BOTT led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.