BOTT vs IVV
Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BOTT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOTT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $56M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +2.34% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.21% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 22, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
BOTT vs IVV Performance
Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BOTT returned +39.21% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, BOTT is up 2.34% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOTT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for BOTT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOTT charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOTT currently yields 0.12% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BOTT and IVV share 3 holdings out of 533 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOTT or IVV?
BOTT has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOTT or IVV?
Over the past year BOTT returned +39.21% vs +23.70% for IVV, so BOTT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BOTT annualized +30.97% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOTT or IVV?
BOTT has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BOTT -38.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BOTT and IVV?
BOTT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOTT and IVV?
BOTT and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 6.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOTT or IVV?
BOTT yields 0.12% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.