BOXA vs IVV

BOXA vs IVV

Which is better, BOXA or IVV?

Long Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBOXAIVV
Expense Ratio0.23%0.03%Best
AUM$16M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.13%1.06%
Holdings11508
YTD Return-1.63%+12.27%Best
1Y Return-1.19%+17.04%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.24%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.08%
Volatility (annualized)3.3%Best12.7%
Max Drawdown-3.5%Best-18.8%
$10,000 over 1.7 years$10,349$13,187Best
Fund FamilyAlpha ArchitectiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleLong Term BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 17, 2024May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.7 years).

BOXA vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.

BOXA vs IVV Performance

Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) is an ETF from Alpha Architect and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BOXA returned -1.19% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, BOXA is down 1.63% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 3.3% for BOXA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.5% for BOXA and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BOXA charges 0.23% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOXA currently yields 0.13% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in BOXA and 490 in IVV, totalling 4.7% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in BOXA and 490 in IVV, against full books of 11 and 508.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BOXA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BOXAIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BOXA or IVV?

BOXA has an expense ratio of 0.23% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BOXA or IVV?

Over the past year BOXA returned -1.19% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BOXA annualized +2.04% vs +17.67% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BOXA or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 3.3% for BOXA. Worst drawdown: BOXA -3.5% vs IVV -18.8%.

Should I hold both BOXA and IVV?

BOXA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BOXA or IVV?

BOXA yields 0.13% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BOXA?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.