BPRO vs IVV
Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BPRO or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 86.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BPRO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $104M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 20 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -15.28% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Top 10 Weight | 86.4% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Bitwise | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 21, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BPRO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BPRO vs IVV Performance
Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (BPRO) is an ETF from Bitwise and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BPRO is down 15.28% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BPRO charges 0.96% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BPRO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 16 holdings in BPRO and 490 in IVV, totalling 100.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 16 positions we hold weights for in BPRO and 490 in IVV, against full books of 20 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BPRO (98.6% of the fund), and 6 for BPRO that do not appear in IVV (31.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BPRO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BPRO or IVV?
BPRO has an expense ratio of 0.96% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BPRO or IVV?
BPRO yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BPRO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 86.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.