BREM vs IVV
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BREM or IVV?
Emerging Markets Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BREM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $35M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.92% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 168 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +2.33% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.11% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Emerging Markets Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BREM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BREM vs IVV Performance
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF (BREM) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BREM returned +5.11% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, BREM is up 2.33% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BREM charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BREM currently yields 4.92% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings BREM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BREM, our book for it covers 36.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BREM and 490 in IVV, against full books of 168 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BREM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 2.73% | 0.15% | 2.58% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BREM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BREM or IVV?
BREM has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BREM or IVV?
Over the past year BREM returned +5.11% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BREM or IVV?
BREM yields 4.92% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BREM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BREM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.