BRIE vs SCHD

BRIE vs SCHD

Which is better, BRIE or SCHD?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. BRIE is less concentrated, with 20.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns (1Y): SCHDLess Concentrated: BRIE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBRIESCHD
Expense Ratio0.34%0.06%Best
AUM$490M$112.2B
Dividend Yield0.36%3.13%
Holdings165103
YTD Return+16.50%+26.13%Best
1Y Return+26.39%+30.01%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+16.09%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.95%
Top 10 Weight20.5%Best41.5%
Fund FamilyMFS Investment ManagementCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 22, 2025Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BRIE vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BRIE vs SCHD Performance

MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF (BRIE) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BRIE returned +26.39% while SCHD returned +30.01%. Year to date, BRIE is up 16.50% versus a gain of 26.13% for SCHD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BRIE charges 0.34% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $6 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRIE currently yields 0.36% against 3.13% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 159 holdings in BRIE and 100 in SCHD, totalling 98.2% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 129 days apart, BRIE as of Mar 31, 2026 and SCHD as of Aug 7, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 159 positions we hold weights for in BRIE and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 165 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for BRIE (99.7% of the fund), and 10 for BRIE that do not appear in SCHD (5.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BRIE and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BRIESCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BRIE or SCHD?

BRIE has an expense ratio of 0.34% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BRIE or SCHD?

Over the past year BRIE returned +26.39% vs +30.01% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BRIE or SCHD?

BRIE yields 0.36% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than BRIE?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. BRIE is less concentrated, with 20.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.